Posted by carlos on September 21, 19104 at 21:32:07:
In Reply to: Global warming - Can earth explode? posted by Dr Tom J. Chalko on June 13, 19101 at 12:17:15:
: No second chance? Can Earth explode as a result of Global Warming?
: Dr Tom J. Chalko,MSc,PhD
: NU Journal of Discovery http://NUjournal.net/core.pdf
: Abstract: The presence of the Earth’s solid inner core in the center of our planet is verified by six decades of seismic measure-ments. This article presents a proof that the very existence of the solid inner core implies the existence of a lower bound for its size and density. The fundamental equilibrium conditions prove that Earth’s solid inner core could not have "grown" to its present size over time, simply because a core any smaller would not remain concentric. The solid core that we detect today could have only decayed from a core of larger size.
: The existence of the lower bound for the size and density of the inner core constitutes a proof that virtually all heat generated inside our planet is of radionic origin. Hence, Earth in its entirety can be considered a nuclear reactor with an "inner core" providing a major contribution to the total energy output. Since radionic heat is generated in the entire volume and cooling can only occur at the surface, it is obvious that the highest temperature inside Earth occurs at the center of the inner core. Overheating the center of the inner core reactor due to the so-called greenhouse effect on the surface of Earth may cause a meltdown condition, an enrichment of nuclear fuel and a gigantic atomic explosion.
: Consequences of global warming are far more serious than previously imagined. The REAL danger for our entire civilization comes not from slow climate changes, but from overheating of the planetary interior.
: See http://NUjournal.net/core.pdf for details
: With Love & Light
: Dr Tom Chalko
: tjc@sci-e-research.com
:What? I respecfully disagree to some measure. Overheating the center of the inner core reactor due to the so-called greenhouse effect on the surface of Earth may NOT cause a meltdown condition, an enrichment of nuclear fuel and a gigantic atomic explosion. The condition, in which much of ‘the race’ and of the animal and flora would have a very hard time to continue to exist, is other than that of the greenhouse effect and I don’t think there is a term for it yet. Drastic measures and events not to mention the pressure of that condition in (long)time may set off cooling procedures whether it be a gigantic atomic explosion or fractures, earthquakes and free-flowing rivers of molten rocks in critical or delicate parts of the planet. Calling upon adaptation and survival instincts (I am picturing 4th grade-science book-prehistoric pictures) .--Maybe the ‘outcome effects of nuclear war’ is the term and condition.
The greenhouse effect by the same token should not be taken ever so lightly and it is an issue that plays in near future. It stages and forecasts our potential severe weather conditions; it's progressive consequences are proportional to change of life on earth...I have more, but, I’ve stepped enough. -Agreed-there will not be a second chance eather way.
Carlos
Roustabout at the HI-II.
Fossil fuel Exploitation-I mean- Exploration.