Popper beginner:
Popper, Karl Discussion Deck
If ye would like to moderate the Popper, Karl Discussion Deck, please drop becket@jollyroger.com a
line.
Popper, Karl & Popper beginner
DR. ELLIOT'S NORTH AMERICAN GREAT BOOKS TOUR--COMING TO A BOOK
STORE NEAR YOU
[GREAT
BOOKS: DISCUSS THE
TRAGEDY OF DRAKERAFT.COM][Great Books Lovers Match]
[Physics Forums][Poetry][Shakespeare's Plays][Great Books][Open Source Business]
[Great Books Games][Federalist Papers][Poetry Contest][Classic eCards][Great Books
Forums]
The
World's Largest Literary Cafe: Carolinanavy.com
[JollyRoger.com Greeting Cards][JollyRoger.com Web Pages][JollyRoger.com
Discussion Fleet][JollyRoger.com]
[Carolinanavy.com][Nantuckets.com][BusinessPhilosophy.com][Classicals.com][Quarterdeck]
[
Jolly Roger Live
Chat][The Jolly
Roger][KillDevilHill.com][Western Canon University]
[Federalistnavy.com Spirit of
America][Starbuck.com Clical Poetry Port]
[ussconstitutions.com]
[Free jollyrogermail]
[Shakespearean
Greetings]
[nantucketnavy.com][hatteraslight.com][Clicgreetings.com]
[SEARCH]
[Follow Ups][Post Followup][Popper, Karl Forum Frigate]
[]
[The
World's Largest Literary Cafe: Carolinanavy.com]
Posted by wendy on April 23, 19101 at 16:55:04:
I've just written my first Popper essay. Problem: how to reconcile Popper's words "knowing very well ... pseudo-science may happen to stumble on the truth" with all that comes after. If truth can only be conjectural, and pseudo-science isn't falsificatory or deductive - how can it stumble on truths for science??
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup